Really?
This is the problem with our exam boards? Look between the lines here. Surely what this actually highlights is that even examiners, perhaps subliminally, acknowledge and accept that todays exams are based on a system of jumping through hoops.
Examiners are guiding teachers, and thus implicitly students, towards the right answers: simply because without such guidance, its beyond most exactly what these examiners want. Real intelligence,passion and flair will get you nowhere - ticking the boxes, or rather, assessment objectives as they are known amongst students and teachers, will take you straight to that A grade. Examiners giving hints such as the exact topic within a course to study is actually neither here nor there - simply because the marking styles, and in fact the expectations amongst examiners varies so widely. Indeed, it is a universal fact that one man’s trash is another man’s treasure - in lamens terms, a answer one examiner may love, another will hate. A fact undeniable in the study of English Literature: and I speak from personal experience.
As a student, it is frustrating to constantly hear that exams are being ‘dumbed down’. Whilst I do not deny that perhaps the standards have slipped, let us just for one moment also consider that maybe the examiners themselves are not quite what they used to be. Examiners used to be specialists in their fields, not teachers who often have never even studied the specific areas in which they are marking. Would an examiner discredit reasons given in a History exam, simply because they happened outside of a given date? Surely a specialist in their subject would appreciate the depth of the answer, and see too that such a question required such breadth. A more harrowing example is when an examiner actually placed Joseph Stalin and John Kennedy in power, at the same time. I wish I was joking.
Exams today, as many teachers I’m sure will agree, are a far cry from a measure of intelligence. They are a test of obedience… and a very expensive test at that.




